Die Einbindung von Menschen mit Behinderungen in qualitative Sozialforschung

Die Kombination qualitativer Face-to-Face-, digitaler und telekommunikativer Interviews mit einer qualitativen Onlineerhebung während der Pandemie

Autor/innen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53205/qualmet.v1i1.9

Schlagworte:

Qualitative Sozialforschung, Interviews, Onlineerhebung, Menschen mit Behinderungen, Pandemie

Abstract

Hintergrund der Studie war die Beleuchtung ermöglichender und restringierender Faktoren für einen inklusiven und grenzübergreifenden Sozialraum für Menschen mit Behinderungen (MmB) in der Grenzregion Bayern-Tirol. Im Folgenden wird auf die methodologische und methodische Strategie sowie Erfahrung des qualitativen Ansatzes in der Inklusion von MmB in der Forschung und während der Pandemie eingegangen. In einer ersten Phase wurden 38 Inneninterviews mit MmB, deren Angehörigen, Arbeitgeber:innen und Mitarbeiter:innen von Institutionen, Politik und Verwaltung geführt. In einer zweiten Phase wurden die zentralen Themengebiete beziehungsweise Ergebnisse aus den Expert:inneninterviews anhand der qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse herausgearbeitet, in acht Kurzbeschreibungen zusammengefasst und in einer qualitativen Onlineerhebung, die sich am Prinzip der partizipativen Konsensbildung orientierte, zur Disposition gestellt. Insgesamt 51 Teilnehmer:innen – darunter die Interviewpartner:innen und bereits angeführten Gruppen – nahmen an der qualitativen Onlineerhebung teil. Die Teilnehmer:innen erhielten so die Möglichkeit, die verdichteten Ergebnisse einer vorangegangenen Befragung zu reflektieren und eine zweite Einschätzung abzugeben. Um die Onlineerhebung für MmB zugänglich zu machen, wurden die Kurztexte professionell in ‚Leicht Lesen‘ übersetzt und die Benutzerfreundlichkeit des Befragungstools 2ask wurde von Menschen mit Sehbehinderungen getestet. Am Ende wurden die Ergebnisse aus beiden Phasen verdichtet und zusammengeführt. In der im Folgenden präsentierten Studie wird auf die unterschiedlichen Charakteristiken und Ansprüche im Umgang mit den Zielgruppen während der Erhebung eingegangen. Herausfordernd stellten sich die Akquise, das Bereitstellen von inklusivem Erhebungsmaterial, die inklusive Gestaltung einer qualitativen Onlineerhebung sowie die Schaffung von Legitimation zur Bearbeitung eines Themas, das MmB in den Mittelpunkt rückt, dar. Ein klarer Vorteil der Inklusion von MmB in die Beforschung von Themen, die sie selbst betreffen, liegt in der Nähe zum Gegenstand und der daran geknüpften Erarbeitung lebensnaher Lösungsvorschläge.

Downloads

Keine Nutzungsdaten vorhanden.

Literaturhinweise

Abrams, L. S. (2010). Sampling ‘Hard to Reach’ Populations in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Social Work, 9(4), 536–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325010367821

Abbott, S. & R. McConkey (2006). The barriers to social inclusion as perceived by people with intellec-tual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 10(3), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629506067618

Atkinson, D. (1997). An auto/biographical approach to learning disability research. Ashgate Publishing.

Balandin, S., J. Goldbar. (2011). Qualitative Research and AAC: Strong Methods and New Topics. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27(4), 227–228. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2011.630409

Beail, N.. K. Williams (2014). Using qualitative methods in research with people who have intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 27(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12088

Booth, T., W. Booth. (1996). Sounds of Silence: Narrative research with inarticulate subjects. Disability & Society, 11:1, 55-70, https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599650023326

Booth, T., W. Booth (2010). Sounds of Silence: Narrative research with inarticulate subjects. Disability & Society, 11(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599650023326

Bourdieu, P. (2003) Images d’Algérie, une affinite elective. Actes Sud.

Brewer, J. (2000). Ethnography. Understanding Social Research. Open University Press.

Braun, V., V. Clarke (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE.

Braun, V., V. Clarke, D. Gary (2017). Innovations in qualitative methods. In B. Gough (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical social psychology (243–266). Palgrave Macmillan.

Braun, V., V. Clarke, E. Boulton, L. Davey, C. McEvoy (2020). The online survey as qualitative re-search tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550

Bundesministerium Soziales, Gesundheit, Pflege und Konsumentenschutz (BMSGPK) (2016). UN-Behindertenrechtskonvention. Deutsche Übersetzung der Konvention und des Fakultativprot-kolls. https://broschuerenservice.sozialministerium.at/Home/Download?publicationId=19

Cambridge, P., M. McCarthy (2001). User focus groups and Best Value in services for people with learn-ing disabilities. Health and Social Care in the Community, 9(6), 476–489. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0966-0410.2001.00328.x

Clark, T. (2011). Gaining and Maintaining Access. Qualitative Social Work, 10(4), 485–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325009358228

Cortese, C., F. Truscott, M. Nikidehaghani, S. Chapple (2019). Hard-to-reach: the NDIS, disability, and socio-economic disadvantage. Disability & Society, 36(6), 883–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1782173

Courtenay, K., B. Perera (2020). COVID-19 and people with intellectual disability: impacts of a pan-demic. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 37(3), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2020.45

Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE.

Crowley, J. E. (2007). Friend or Foe? Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 36(6), 603–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241606293603

Dassah, E., H. Aldersey, M.A. McColl, C. Davison (2018). Factors affecting access to primary health care services for persons with disabilities in rural areas: a “best-fit” framework synthesis. Global Health Research and Policy, 3(36), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-018-0091-x

Dempsey, L., M. Dowling, P. Larkin, K. Murphy (2016). Sensetive Interviewing in Qualitative Re-search. Research in Nursing & Health, 39(6), 480-490. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21743

Dimmel, N., M. Schenk, C. Stelzer-Orthofer (2014). Handbuch Armut in Österreich. StudienVerlag.

Doody, O. (2012). Families’ views on their relatives with intellectual disability moving from a long-stay psychiatric institution to a community-based intellectual disability service: an Irish context. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(1), S. 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2011.00682.x

Doebrich, A., M. Quirici, C. Lunsford (2020). COVID-19 and the need for disability conscious medical education, training, and practice. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, 13(03), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-200763

Europäische Gemeinschaft (2009). CHARTA DER GRUNDRECHTE DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION. Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaft, 2000/C 364/0. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_de.pdf

European Commission (2008). Poverty and Social Exclusion in Rural Areas. European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities. https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=2087&langId=en

European Commission (2020, January 07). Temporary Reintroduction of Border Control. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/reintroduction-border-control_en

European Union (2012). Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, C 326/02, 391–407. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX %3A12012P %2FTXT

European Union (2019). Smarter, greener, more inclusive? Indicators to support the Europe 2020 Strate-gy. Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/10155585/KS-04-19-559-EN-N.pdf/b8528d01-4f4f-9c1e-4cd4-86c2328559de?t=1570181425000

Faugier, J., M. Sargeant (1997). Sampling hard to reach populations. Journal of advanced nursing, 26(4), 790–797. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.00371.x

Flick, U., E. von Kardorff, I. Steinke (2013). Was ist qualitative Forschung? Einleitung und Überblick. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, I. Steinke (Hrsg.): Qualitative Forschung. Ein Handbuch. Rowohlt Verlag.

Frankel, R. M., K. Devers (2000). Qualitative research: A consumer's guide. Education for Health: Change in Learning & Practice, 13(1), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/135762800110664

Glaser, B. G., A. L. Strauss (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Company.

Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Sociology Press.

Gonzalez, M., M. Phoenix, S. Saxena, R. Cardoso, M. Canac-Marquis, L. Hales, C. Putterman, K. Shikako-Thomas (2019). Strategies used to engage hard-to-reach populations in childhood disa-bility research: a scoping review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 43(19), 2815–2827. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1717649

Gray, D., J. Shaw, J. Farrington (2006). Community transport, social capital and social exclusion in rural areas. Area, 38(1),89–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2006.00662.x

Gracht, H. A. von der (2012): Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: review and implications for future quality assurance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(8), 1525–1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013

Groger, L., P.S. Mayberry, J. K. Straker (1999). What we didn’t learn because of who would not talk to US. Qualitative Health Research, 9(6), 829–835. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973299129122180

Hermanowicz, J. C. (2002). The great interview: 25 strategies for studying people in bed. Qualitative Sociology, 25(4), 479-499. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021062932081

Hollomotz, A. (2018). Successful interviews with people with intellectual disability. Qualitative Re-search, 18(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117713810

Holloway, I. (1997). Basic Concepts for Qualitative Research. Wiley-Blackwell.

Hoppe, G. K. (2012). Terminologie und Dimensionen von geistiger Behinderungen. In G.K. Hoppe.: Selbstkonzept und Empowerment bei Menschen mit geistiger Behinderung. Gender and Diversi-ty. Centaurus Verlag & Media: 11-18.

Holt, A. (2010). Using the telephone for narrative interviewing: a research note. Qualitative Research, 10(1), 113–121. https://doiorg/10.1177/1468794109348686

Jahoda, M., P. F. Lazarsfeld, H. Zeisl (1975). Die Arbeitslosen von Marienthal.: Ein soziographischer Versuch über die Wirkungen langandauernder Arbeitslosigkeit. Suhrkamp.

Kawulich, B. (2011). Gatekeeping: An ongoing adventure in research. Field Methods, 23(1), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X10383388

Koelewijn, A., C. Lemain, A. K. Honingh, P.S. Sterkenburg (2020). View of relatives on quality of care: narratives on the care for people with visual and intellectual disabilities. Disability & Soci-ety, 00(00), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2021.1947192

Langford, C.R., M. Lngnick-Hall, M. Kulkarni (2013). How Do Social Networks Influence the Em-ployment Prospects of People with Disabilities. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 26, 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-012-9194-6

Lenzer, T. (2012). Effects of Survey Question Comprehensibility on Response Quality. Field Methods, 24(4), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X12448166

Lloyd, V., A. Gatherer, S. Kalsy, S. (2006). Conducting qualitative interview research with people with expressive language difficulties. Qualitative health research, 16(10), 1386–1404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306293846

Maaß, C. (2020). Easy Language – Plain Language – Easy Language Plus: Balancing Comprehensibil-ity and Acceptability. Frank & Timme. https://doi.org/10.26530/20.500.12657/42089

Macdonald, S. J., J. Clayton, J. (2011). Back to the future, disability and the digital divide. Disability & Society, 28(5), 702–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.732538

Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Soft-ware Solution. Beltz.

McColl, M.A., A. Jarzynowska, S. E. D. Shortt (2010). Unmet health care needs of people with disabili-ties: population level evidence. Disability & Society, 25(2), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590903537406

McLaughlin, J., E. Coleman-Fountain. (2019). Visual methods and voice in disabled childhoods re-search: troubling narrative authenticity. Qualitative Research, 19(4), 363–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118760705

McQuillen, M., S. F. Terry (2020). Genetic and Disability Discrimination During COVID-19. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, 24(12), 759–760. https://doi.org/10.1089/gtmb.2020.29059.ste

Merton, B. (1998). Finding the Missing. Leicester. Youth Work Press.

Nikander, P. (2008). Working with transcripts and translated data. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5(3), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880802314346

O'Day, B., M. Killeen (2002). Research on the lives of persons with disabilities: The emerging im-portance of qualitative research methodologies. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 13(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073020130010201

Orton, M. (2019). Challenges for anti-poverty action: Developing approaches that are solutions focused, participative and collaborative. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 27(1), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1332/175982718X15451304184475

Pallisera, M., M. Vilà, J. Fullana (2012). Beyond school inclusion: secondary school and preparing for labour market inclusion for young people with disabilities in Spain. International Journal of In-clusive Education, 16(11), 1115–1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2010.548104

Pallisera, M., J. Fullana, C. Puyaltó, M. Vilá, (2016). Changes and challenges in the transition to adult-hood: views and experiences of young people with learning disabilities and their families. Euro-pean Journal of Special Needs Education, 31(3), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1163014

Parker, C., S. Scott, A. Geddes (2019). Snowball Sampling. In P. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Cernat, J. W. Sakshaug, R. A. & Williams (Eds.) Research Methods Foundations. SAGE. https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036831710

Pollack, M., N. Kowarz, J. Partheymüller, (2021, March 09). Chronology of the Corona Crisis in Aus-tria - Part 4: Lockdowns, mass testing and the launch of the vaccination campaign. University of Vienna. https://viecer.univie.ac.at/en/projects-and-cooperations/austrian-corona-panel-project/corona-blog/corona-blog-beitraege/blog100-en/

Raghavan, R., N. Pawson (2008). Transition and social networks of young people with learning disabili-ties. Advances in Mental Health and Learning Disabilities, 2(3), 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/17530180200800027

Reed, N. S., L. M. Meeks, B. K. Swenor, B. K. (2020). Disability and COVID-19: who counts depends on who is counted. The Lancet Public Health, 5(8), 423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30161-4

Russell, L. (2013). Researching marginalised young people. Ethnography and Education, 8(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2013.766433

Sabatello, M. (2020). People with Disabilities in COVID-19: fixing our priorities. The American Jour-nal of Bioethics, 20(7), 187–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2020.1779396

Sabatello, M., B. T. Blankmeyer, K. E. McDonald, P. S. Applebaum (2020). Disability, Ethics, and Health Care in the COVID-19 Pandemic. American Journal of Public Health, 110(10), 1523–1527.

Saunders, B., J. Sim, T. Kingstone, S. Baker, J. Waterfield, B. Bartlam, H. Burroughs, C. Jinks, (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8

Scheibelhofer, E. (2008). Combining narration‐based interviews with topical interviews: Methodological reflections on research practices. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(5), 403–416. DOI: 10.1080/13645570701401370.https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305837

Sebrechts, M. (2018, August 11). When doing you best is not good enough: Shaping recognition in sheltered workshops: The interplay of activating institutions, professionals, co-workers and a so-ciologist. PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam. Available at: https://dare.uva.nl/search?identifier=9799be8b-126b-4195-b725-f6c3605f92fc

Shamon, H., C. C. Bering (2020). Attention Check Items and Instructions in Online Surveys with Incen-tivized and Non-Incentivized Samples: Boon or Bane for Data Quality? Survey Research Meth-ods, 14(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2020.v14i1.7374

Simmons, R., R. Thompson, L. Russel (2014). Education, Work and Social Change: Young People and Marginalization in Post-Industrial Britain. Palgrave Macmillan.

Teachman, G., B. E. Gibson (2013). Children and youth with disabilities: innovative methods for single qualitative interviews. Qualitative health research 23 (2), S. 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312468063

Temple, B., A. Young (2004). Qualitative research and translation dilemmas. Qualitative Research, 4(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794104044430

Terry, G., V. Braun (2017). Short but often sweet: The surprising potential of qualitative survey meth-ods. In V. Braun, V. Clarke, & D. Gray (Eds.), Collecting qualitative data: A practical guide to textual, media and virtual techniques. Cambridge University Press. 15-44.

Thomas, W. I., F. Znaniecki (1958). The Polish peasant in Europe and America. Dover Publications.

Turk, M. A., S. D. Landes, M. K. Formica, K. D. Goss (2020). Intellectual and developmental disabil-ity and COVID-19 case-fatality trends: TriNetX analysis. Disability and health journal, 13(3), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100942

United Nations (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). United Nations Publications. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities-2.html

United Nations (2022, January 07). Policy Brief: A Disability-Inclusive Response to COVID-19. https://unsdg.un.org/resources/policy-brief-disability-inclusive-response-covid-19

van Deursen, A., J. van Dijk (2018). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media & Society, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082

Van Oorschot, W. (1994). Take it or leave it: a study of non-take-up of social security benefits. Universi-ty Press.

Waddington, L. (2010). Disability Benefits and Entitlements in European Countries: Mutual Recogni-tion and Exportability of Benefits. Academic Network of European Disability experts (ANED). https://www.disability-europe.net/downloads/76-aned-2010-task-7-disability-benefits-and-entitlements-report-final-2

Waddington, L. (2012). The Protection of Consumers with Disabilities in the European Union: Persons with Disabilities as Active Participants in the Internal Market. Academic Network of European Disability experts (ANED). https://www.disability-europe.net/theme/consumer-protection

Waddington, L. (2014). Access to Healthcare by People with Disabilities in Europe – A Comparative Study of Legal Frameworks and Instruments. Academic Network of European Disability experts (ANED). https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/access-to-healthcare-by-people-with-disabilities-in-europe-a-comp

Weller, S. (2017). Using internet video calls in qualitative (longitudinal) interviews: Some implications for rapport. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1269505

Whyte, W. F. (1943). Street corner society; the social structure of an Italian slum. University of Chicago Press.

Witzel, A., H. Reiter (2012). The problem-centered interview: Principles and practice. SAGE.

Woodgate, R.L., M. Gonzalez, L. Demczuk, W. M. Snow, S. Barriage, S. Kirk (2019). How do peers promote social inclusion of children with disabilities?A mixed-methods systematic review. Dis-ability and Rehabilitation, 42(18), 2553–2579. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1561955

World Health Organization (2020, January 07). Disability considerations during the COVID-19 outbreak. WHO/2019- nCoV/Disability/2020.1. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Disability-2020-1

Downloads

Veröffentlicht

08.05.2023

Zitationsvorschlag

Kerschbaumer, L., Gell, S., & Boost, M. (2023). Die Einbindung von Menschen mit Behinderungen in qualitative Sozialforschung: Die Kombination qualitativer Face-to-Face-, digitaler und telekommunikativer Interviews mit einer qualitativen Onlineerhebung während der Pandemie. Qual.Met /Journal, 1(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.53205/qualmet.v1i1.9

Ausgabe

Rubrik

Wissenschaftlicher Artikel